Agenda item

Budget Context Setting and Overview

To consider the report of the Financial Services Group Manager followed by discussion in preparation for the Budget Portfolio Holder sessions scheduled as follows:  


1st Portfolio Session


20 January 2016




Finance, Efficiency & Assets

Cllr Terry Richardson, Leader

Performance, People, Special Projects and Cabinet Support 

Cllr David Clements

Partnerships & Corporate Services

Cllr David Freer

Health Improvement & Leisure Services

Cllr Sheila Scott


2nd Portfolio Session


27 January



Neighbourhood & Environmental Health Services

Cllr Guy Jackson

Community Services


Cllr Maggie Wright

Planning, Economic Dev & Housing Strategy

Cllr Tony Greenwood



Considered – Report of the Financial Services Group Manager (FSGM). 


The Chairman, Cllr Bill Wright opened the meeting by welcoming all attendees and invited the FSGM to present the overview of the Budget for 2016/17.


Key points raised from the FSGM included:


·        Uncertainty around how New Home Bonus and Business Rates will be distributed in the future

·        Reduction in core grant, though figures are provisional and may change over time

·        £525k reflects income and savings made by Officers


The FSGM responded to Cllr Les Phillimore’s question that the £525k does not include any savings made as a result of Channel Shift, but does include income from benefits overpayments and planning fees. 


The FSGM then raised the following points in respect of funding the budget:


·        Reduced formula grant - £76k less than what was expected

·        New Homes Bonus Grant – is £314k higher than what the council was expecting


There is a £170k gap in the budget and the following options open to the Council are:


Removal of New Homes Bonus (NHB) distributed to Parish Councils - £124k


Cllr. Lee Breckon requested that a list be circulated to all Members detailing how many Parish Councils may be affected by the removal of the New Homes Bonus.


Cllr. Iain Hewson queried how this would affect  Parish Councils who may rely on NHB in setting precepts. 


The FSGM confirmed that Parish Councils are kept informed of the status of NHB during quarterly meetings.  The Council does not guarantee that the Bonus will be given and Parish Councils do not build the NHB into the setting of the precept.


Removal of Council Tax Support Grant to Parishes - £194k


The FSGM provided a quick background to precepts and how Council Tax Support had replaced Council Tax Benefit.  Although the Council has no obligation to pass this Grant to Parishes, guidance from Government has suggested that an appropriate amount should be provided. 


The Leader of the Council, Cllr. Terry Richardson commented that although no legislation had been passed by central government to ensure that all Councils provided the Grant to Parishes, the Council had always ensured that the Grant given to BDC was distributed among Parishes.  It was important that Members were informed of the choices available to them.


The FSGM continued with the presentation:   


Council Tax Increase


·        Previously freeze grants were available, however it did not equate to how much was raised if Council Tax was increased. 

·        No freeze grant is expected this year

·        The referendum limits are expected to remain at 2%

·        The Council would generate £90k if it increased Council Tax by 1.99%, which equates to £2.85 per annum

·        Alternatively, those authorities listed as a ‘relevant shire district’ within the DCLG draft report could raise Council Tax (without triggering a referendum) by £5, generating £158k to the budget.

·        The FSGM confirmed that the Council could only raise Council Tax by either 1.99% or the increase of £5 – not both together. 

·        In previous years the Council has done a budget survey, this year it was combined in the Residents’ Survey

·        1300 residents responded – statistically this is enough to be reflective of the District and has a good response rate of all wards.

·        68% of responses supported/strongly agreed with raising Council Tax

·        Increasing Council tax by £5 was not asked as the legislation to do this is still in draft format


Contributions from Reserves


400k will be utilised from the General Fund, the FSGM commented that the level of reserves were healthy and they can be used in the future to implement any new systems to save money, i.e. ‘spend to save’


Additional Options to Utilise Reserves


A number of externally funded posts have been identified as being at risk due to the lack of confirmation that funding will continue.


The FSGM said Portfolio Holders will be able to provide further information on this at the individual Portfolio Holder Scrutiny sessions. 


The Director of People commented that the Council usually have an indication from the County Council about the level of funding.  The posts are currently funded by public health grants.


Cllr. Iain Hewson asked whether there was enough in reserves for the redundancies?


The Director of People responded that County Council will also provide assistance in paying any redundancy costs.   

New Homes Bonus


·        The Council has continued to see improved performance with £1.9m being utilised to fund services.

·        Future of NHB may mean that local authorities have to support strategic development and must have a local plan to qualify for the bonus

·        Council’s own local plan is well developed

·        Future could also see reducing payments for authorities where homes have been built on appeal.


Cllr. Alan Tanner commented that the future of NHB seems as it may be phased out by year 5.  It also puts pressure on Parish Councils to continue to build to receive funding.  This could have a negative effect on the planning committee as it may be seen as not being robust. 


Business Rates


Cllr. Antony Moseley left the meeting and did not return.


·        The Spending Review did not clarify how local authorities will keep 100% of business rates

·        It is clear that those authorities will be rewarded where economic growth is promoted.


It was agreed that the Economic Development Strategy would be brought to and considered by Scrutiny for feedback later in the year. 


Impact of Welfare Reform


The FSGM commented that the Portfolio Holder for Community Services would provide more detail on:


·        The benefit cap and impact on families in the area

·        Debt issues

·        Lack of affordable rented homes


The Leader, Cllr Terry Richardson thanked the FSGM and the Finance team for providing a comprehensive explanation and introduction to the budget. 







Supporting documents: